Comparing and Contrasting Four Leadership Models and Theories

The following radical outlines the comparison and contrast of four move models and theories. The purpose of this paper is to acquaint readers with the basic concepts underlying from for each one one model and speculation. A re ensure of the scholarly studies on lead shows that there is a wide manikin of disparate hypothetical approaches to explain the complexities of the leadinghip process (e.g., Bass, 1990; Bryman, 1992; Gardner, 1990; Hickman 1998; Rost, 1991). Some searchers think as a trait, or as behavior, while others view leadership from a political perspective, or from a human-centered viewpoint. The paper begins with a description of leadership trait theory, a theory that concerns itself solely with leader characteristics. Following this, two theories be reviewed. They be: transactional leadership and calamity approach to leadership. The paper concludes with a compute at transformational leadership. Although these leadership theories or models could be considered contingency models, they are addressed separately because of the emphasis that they place on religion and follower development. Trait TheoryIn the early 1900s, leadership traits were canvas to acquire what made certain people owing(p) leaders. The theories that were developed were called, ? large man? theories because they focused on identifying the innate qualities and characteristics possessed by great social, political, and military leaders (e.g. Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Mohandas Gandhi).

It was believed that people were innate(p) with these traits and tho ?great? people possesse d them. During this time search hard on d! etermining the specific traits that clearly severalise leaders from followers (Bass, 1990; Jago, 1982). Although different researchers identified a variety of leadership traits and characteristics, it is generally thought that there are tailfin postulate leadership traits: intelligence, self-confidence, determination, integrity, and sociability. In the mid-1900s, the trait approach was challenged by research that questioned the universality of leadership traits. In a major review... If you involve to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay